Teamsters Local 107 in Philadelphia scored quite a haul (before the nepotism charges, that is.)
Lights. Camera. Infraction. Teamsters Local 107 will not be able to continue to take advantage of its lucrative position placing Philly Teamsters on sets when movies–and movie stars–come to town. From the Philadelphia Inquirer: It’s a chance to rub elbows with Hollywood stars. And make good money while doing it. For years, a select group of Teamsters [more...]

Posted Tue, 16 Mar 2010 .

Union backing in Arkansas a touchy subject
Arkansas’ Senate seat is just one battle ground against moderate Democrats who have not lived up to Big Labor’s EFCA expectations. Lt. Gov. Bill Halter released a press statement detailing more than $500,000 in campaign contributions by labor groups to Blanche Lincoln. The same release calls Blanche’s accusations that Halter’s debt has been paid off to [more...]

Posted Mon, 15 Mar 2010 .

No Reason For Elections?

enlarge

download .pdf

After pressuring members of the House of Representatives to pass the comically misnamed “Employee Free Choice Act” in March 2007, union officials continued their drive to rewrite organizing rules by raising the issue in the Senate in June.

Labor leaders hope to dramatically change the way working Americans join unions — by stealing every employee’s right to a personal, private vote. Why would union bosses do this? Because they need to rebuild their shrinking membership, and it’s easier to coerce and cajole employees under the “card check” method, which is like an open petition. This is a process rife with intimidation, coercion, and confusion because everyone knows each employee’s preference and because there is often no opportunity given to tell the side of the story union bosses don’t want exposed.

Bruce Raynor, a top union president, claims: “There’s no need to subject the workers to an election.” It would be better to listen to the words of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which said “workers sometimes sign union authorization cards not because they intend to vote for the union in the election but to avoid offending the person who asks them to sign, often a fellow worker, or simply to get the person off their back.”